The given circular representations reveal the information about changes in particular school of UK about the annual spending on five distinct factors during the years: 1981, 1991 and 2001. The data is given in per centum which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it is evident that insurance was the only factor on which least amount of money had been spended wheras, teacher's salaries contained the largest proportion of annual spending.
It can be seen that during the year 1981, the annual spending on teacher's salaries was two-fifth. However, later, in the year 1991, it had been inclined upto 50%. Moreover, furniture and equipment contained less than a fifth proportion whereas, this trend had drastically increased to less than a quarter in the year: 2001. In spite of this, per year changes in insurance during the year; 1981, 1991 and 2001 were 2%, 3% and 8% respectively.
As far as trend was concerned, it is possible to make comparison of resources during the years: 1981 and 1991 because in the year 1981, annual spending on it was 40% while it was increased with 10% during the year 1991. Furthermore, other worker's salaries followed a fluctuating trend; neither it incresed in 1991 nor in the year 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'which the least'.
Suggestion: which the least
...t that insurance was the only factor on which least amount of money had been spended wheras...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in particular, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04368932039 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70091870016 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1840059895 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206596309712 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890732388234 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789806865838 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131128843138 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625619539005 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.