The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions
of tonnes, from three different sources, between
1990 and 2005.
The line graph compares the amount of emission released into the air by three different sources from 1900 to 2005.
Overall, the total number of air pollutants annually declined over the period given. Another interesting point is that while there were considerable downward trends for the amount of emission from household and industry, this figure for transport soared dramatically.
Looking at details, in 1900, a total of nearly 8 million tonnes of air contaminants emitted from the three mentioned sources with the largest figure from industry, at just over 6 million tonnes. However, this figure for this source went down enormously, ranking the second place at exactly 2 million tonnes in 2005. As a result, a similar climb was seen in the total air emission, after gradually fell down by around 0.5 million ton each year, it hit a trough at 5 million tone at the end of the period.
Although had a similar beginning point at 1 million ton in 1900, the amount of air pollutants from households and from transport experienced completely two different trends. while households remained their emission unchanged over the first century, this figure for transport fluctuated slightly over the same period then recovered to the initial point at just above 1 million ton in 1999. However, the quantity of air pollutants from transport saw a significant growth, as three times as its data in 1999, finishing the period at 3 million tonnes. By contrast the number of pollutants households discharged to the air dropped to a negligible amount.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ienced completely two different trends. while households remained their emission unch...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, then, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08267716535 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71793014522 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527559055118 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3061461256 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174507675783 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913213594106 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667181359168 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130823940984 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529217758228 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.