The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on the cell phone and national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010
The line graph compares the number of people who spent on money for using mobile phones, national and overseas landline services over a period of 9 years, starting from 2001.
In general, there was a considerable increase in the consumption of cell phone and overseas landline services, while the opposite trend could be seen in the figure for national fixed-line services. In particular, yearly spending on national landline services was highest, except for the period from 2006 to 2010.
In 2001, the consumers' average yearly spending on national fixed-line services stood at 700 dollars, while the average yearly spent on mobile phones and international landline services were lower, at 200 and 250 dollars orderly. Over the next 4 years, America saw a considerable decrease of 140 dollars. In contrast, this country saw the consumers' average yearly spending on cell phone increase considerably to 450 dollars, and the figure for overseas landline services increased slightly to 300 dollars in 2003.
From the year 2006 onwards, that of mobile phone services overtook the figure for national landline services, there was a considerable rise, from 500 dollars in 2006 to 750 dollars in the last year, in the average yearly spending on the cell phone. Meanwhile, the figure for national landline phones underwent a considerable fall from 500 dollars to 400 dollars at the end of the period. During the same period, there was stability in the figure for overseas phone calls.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ept for the period from 2006 to 2010. In 2001, the consumers average yearly spen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, except for, in contrast, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20083682008 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65493618048 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44769874477 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7197157097 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.111111111 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231498752885 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110918105824 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642890864655 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159577455167 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501634017742 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.