The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto metro system for July,2017.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparison where neccesary?

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto metro system for July,2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparison where neccesary?

It is observed from linear graph about the activities at Toronto Metro system from Monday to Friday in July 2007 by proportion of travelers. The data is calibrated in thousands, which is clearly and coherently represented.

It is crystal clear that, at 6'o clocks in morning, 100 thousand passenger's visiting was calculated by Toronto metro system. Moreover, proportion upsurged to 400 thousand travelers at 8 clocks in morning. Then, travelers had fell up-to 200 thousand at 10'o clocks in morning. In contrast, At noon, tourer remained volatile up-to 2'o clocks in noon, which were approximately 300 thousand passengers.

As far as trend was concerned, passengers were declining and reached to 100 thousand passengers in afternoon at 4'o clocks. Afterwards, traveler had reached at peak point of 400 thousand at 6'o clocks in evening.Then, travelers were starting decline till 10'o clocks at night.

Overall, it is evident that, passengers visited at Toronto Metro higher in morning and afternoon at 6'o clocks. It could be say that at that time people went and came to/from school and work. But lowered in afternoon at 4'o clocks.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-23 suman kaur 78 view
2018-09-23 suman kaur 73 view
2018-09-23 suman kaur 78 view
2018-09-23 suman kaur 78 view
2018-09-23 suman kaur 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user suman kaur :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...of 400 thousand at 6o clocks in evening.Then, travelers were starting decline till 1...
^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rting decline till 10o clocks at night. Overall, it is evident that, passengers ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, then, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20218579235 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87402604026 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5979769184 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5454545455 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0768943369302 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369106317279 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525469009864 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604369767449 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343247240228 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.