The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the UK, 2000-2010.
As we can see, the line graph illustrates the proportion of people working in three economic sectors in the United Kingdom, over a decade between 2000 and 2010.
Generally speaking, public sector jobs employment rate is considered the highest, and people showed the least concern in self-employed jobs in the year 2000. In addition to this clear point, we can witness that in the year 2010, public sector jobs rose up to highest number; however, private sector employment rate descend at the bottom during the same year.
Between the years 2000 to 2005, public sector started at nearly 40% in 2000, and remained constant throughout first three years. It started rising in 2002 reaching 50% in the year 2005. When looking at self-employment, it fluctuates between 18% and 20% throughout the years, ending with 20% in 2005. Private sector starts with approximate 48%, it then starts descending just above 40% in 2002, and afterwards it remained constant the next year. In year 2003, it again shows step decline reaching just above 30% in the year 2005.
Future predictions indicate that during the year 2005 to 2010, public sector starts with just below 50% and shows a decrement of 5%, and finally rises up to just above 50% at the end of the year 2010. When talking about private sector, over the span of five years, between 2005 to 2010, it started declining reaching 20% in the year 2010. Finally, just like public sector self-employment, jumped to 30% in the year 2009, and remained constant the final year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...e year 2010, public sector jobs rose up to highest number; however, private sector employm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d at the bottom during the same year. Between the years 2000 to 2005, public s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, look, then, in addition, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91828793774 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49005957262 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482490272374 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9576724925 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21297740443 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969414715617 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830519731098 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162580322352 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687221061894 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.