Question: Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
With the advancement in technology, the lifestyle of people has drastically improved, yet causing dangerous effects on the environment. With that in mind, some people are now thinking of adapting to a simpler way of life while others fight that science itself can be a solution to a problem. This essay will provide arguments from both sides, provide detailed analysis, opinion to aid readers with arriving at their own conclusion.
First of all, some people think that adapting to a simple lifestyle just like people who live in the past is the ideal solution to environmental problems. One cause of such a problem can be the use of fossil fuels nowadays, which results in the production of a huge amount of dangerous gases that toxicities the environment. The emission of large amounts of carbon dioxide from motor vehicles can be the cause of air pollution that we are facing currently. Not only the use of fossil fuels can be a reason, but the cutting of millions of trees every year just for the purpose of making different materials is not justified. As trees are considered a tool that converts carbon dioxide into oxygen, they should not be treated like this.
On the other hand, according to some people, modern technology should be used to overcome environmental problems. As explained earlier, fossils fuels are a great threat to environmental problems. To overcome this problem, a great solution would be using electric motors. As electric motors will not produce toxic gases, they are considered environmentally friendly.
I believe, using technology in order to bypass environmental issues is a good option. Yes, adapting to a simple lifestyle is a good option, but in today's world technology can play a vital role to eliminate the negative impacts caused by itself.
In conclusion, whereas some individuals suggest living a simple life while others think of using technology towards its advantage can play a key role to eliminate global disaster. However, the best recommendation is that technology is the solution to every problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-15 | Sunzid_Ahmed | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-13 | ahsan042 | 73 | view |
| 2017-11-15 | Manijot | 74 | view |
| 2015-06-09 | pratik_dkr1 | 73 | view |
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Central heating system 67
- Energy usage in the USA 73
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 in some land 87
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What can be the reason for this What would you suggest as a solution 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10089020772 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87244341145 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53115727003 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1988669403 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247928617768 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084273705665 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614417144065 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145001213799 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351716378137 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.