The graph describes the changes in water supply and sanitation in urban and rural areas between 1980 and 1990.
The Colum chart illustrates the proportion of water supply and sanitation between urban and rural districts in 1980 and 1990. The survey was conducted by The United Nations.
Overall, it is clear that the category of both water supply and sanitation experienced a similar growing trend from 1980 to 1990, and the proportion of water supply in urban areas was generally higher than the one in rural areas.
To begin with, near 70% was recorded in the water supply of urban areas in 1980, it roughly went up by 1% in 1990. Meanwhile, the proportion of water supply in suburban communities climbed rapidly from 28% in 1980 to 45% in 1990.
Turning to the category of sanitation. 59% was depicted in urban areas in 1980, in the ensuing decade, which increased slightly by 2% in 1990. On the other hand, As for sanitation in rural areas, the figure was significantly low in 1980 and 1990, with 13% and 14% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, as for, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62630919733 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9135684508 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487396115022 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212804983125 0.103423049105 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155172033334 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329309634355 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550804563198 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.