The chart shows the information about the amount of coffee produced in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and Vietnam between 1990 and 2010.
It can be seen that for all figures the overall trend was upward, except for the production of coffee in Colombia. In addition, coffee production in Brazil was highest during 20 years, while Vietnam had the lowest figures in its production.
Looking at the chart for more detail, in 1990, the amount of coffee produced started the period at about 0.7 million tonnes in Brazil. This number then peaked at 1.9 million tonnes in 2010. Oppositely, the coffee production in Colombia began the period at around 0.7 million tonnes in 1990. Then, this country experienced a slight decrease in its coffee production, ending at 0.3 million tonnes in the final year.
Regarding other country, in 1990, the amount of coffee produced in Indonesia started at about 0.2 million tonnes and remained stable until 1995. It then rose minimally to about 0.4 million tonnes in 2010 after remaining relatively unchanged during the first five years. Likewise, there was about 0.1 million tonnes of coffee made in Vietnam in the first year. It then remained unchanged until 1995. During the next 15 years, this nation experienced triple rose in its production, reaching almost 0.3 million tonnes in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...7 million tonnes in Brazil. This number then peaked at 1.9 million tonnes in 2010. O...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, look, regarding, then, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08755760369 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41390212836 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488479262673 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4495848763 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224461619184 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995068097532 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613891373453 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162259395909 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571124257744 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.