People’s opinions differ as to whether or not raising taxes on the industrial sector will effectively address environmental pollution. While such measures can reduce contamination by discouraging industries from engaging in polluting activities, I believe that raising people's consciousness about environmental protection and imposing heavy penalties for environment violations would be more feasible solutions to address the root causes of these issues.
On the one hand, increasing taxes on numerous industries can decrease the pollution level to some extent. In reality, several industries that sell low-priced products are more likely to neglect waste treatment processes and utilize hazardous chemicals in their production. Therefore, imposing higher taxes on these plants would act as a deterrent, compelling them to either raise their product prices or adopt environmentally friendly alternatives to avoid polluting activities. For example, countries like Germany and the Netherlands have successfully mitigated contamination by implementing carbon taxes on industries and adopting cleaner technologies and practices in production.
Despite the points mentioned above, environmental pollution can stem from various factors, mainly from poor public perceiveness about the environmental protection and loosed laws for polluting violation, not solely from polluting activities of industries. Therefore, two primary measures can be taken to mitigate these issues. Chief of these is that the government should launch awareness campaigns to educate citizens about the detrimental impacts of environmental pollution and the significance of Earth's protection. These workshops should be carried out in schools as compulsory subjects in the curriculum. Furthermore, strict laws and penalties should be introduced to deter lawbreakers, including heavy monetary fines and business closures, ultimately dissuading them from engaging in further polluting activities.
In conclusion, although increasing taxation on industries may reduce environmental pollution to some extent, I believe that stricter penalties and public awareness of the importance of the protection of the planet would be more effective measures to solve the underlying causes of these issues. I am also convinced that once these approaches are implemented, there will be more people to obey these new regulations, creating a fresher and cleaner environment for everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
People’s opinions differ as to whether or not raising taxes on the industrial sector ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ting activities, I believe that raising peoples consciousness about environmental prote...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 821, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gaging in further polluting activities. In conclusion, although increasing taxat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13702623907 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25380628039 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568513119534 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.7794756165 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.923076923 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189381455709 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711969741858 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608232417817 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126770760221 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459964985589 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.63 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.