The graph shows the number of complaints about noise to the administration of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 .
The chart illustrates the changes in the number of appeals about noise pollution from 1980 to 1996.
Overall, the number of claims about the nature of distracting sounds had significantly changed. The complaints about the road works were steadily decreasing. Meanwhile, those about factory noise were gradually growing, maintaining the same level till the end of the observed period. However, the number of city citizens' discontent with traffic and household noise wildly fluctuated.
In 1980, the highest number of complaints was due to road works (nearly 650), which then nearly halved to 1986. The discontent regarding household and traffic was at a lower level, at about 500 and nearly 300, but declined six years later. By contrast, complaints concerning factory noise followed an upward trend, indicating a rise from the lowest 400 early in the period to well above 700 in 1986.
Subsequently, the road works continued a downward trend, hitting bottom at almost 100 claims by the end. On the other hand, the number of appeals to the city hall about household and traffic had grown significantly after two years of stability. The figures went up to 1200 and 600, respectively. On the contrary, noise pollution produced by factories caused no more complaints, keeping the number at approximately 700.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, then, well, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21904761905 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77092124304 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57619047619 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2840495075 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249856741765 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938596617612 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737356574686 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180007910907 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772508892918 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.