The graph shows the number of tourists to a Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph illustrates the number of visitors to Caribbean Island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total visitors highly dominates the tourist staying on cruise and Island both. Despite this, the number of tourists living on island outnumbered tourists living on cruise ships by a significant margin in 2017.
The tourists staying on cruise ship and on island shows a difference of half million in 2011. The Caribbean Island visitors goes up at 1.5 million and remain constant for 3 consecutive years till 2015. In 2016, it drops slightly just below 1 million but in 2017 it grasps its position again. On the other hand, people living on ships show steady downward curve and coincides with the other mode between the year 2015 and 2016. Despite this,
it attains the highest number of in 2017. It is accountant as 2 million of the total.
With regards to the total number of visitors visiting a Caribbean Island (2010-2017) goes upward from 1 million tourists to around 3 million. It shows a curve. In 2017, the number of visitors goes into the peak at 3 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en the year 2015 and 2016. Despite this, it attains the highest number of in 2017...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80540540541 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44457031646 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518918918919 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9150231643 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0833333333 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4166666667 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456902632157 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16727210083 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120127031669 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27814665791 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111630397295 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.