The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from1982 to 2010 .
The table chart displays the standards of engagement in education while, the pie Illustrates the top level of education achieved by adults.
We can clearly see from the table that the adults males had a higher percentage of educational attainment compared to females.the pie shows a significant variation between education tires. The table chart represents a comparable increase in school attainment rates for both adults males and females across 10years.
The pie shows five different levels of education, with high school qualification representing the highest level at just over third in 2000 while, master qualification represents the least percentage in this year.
As of 2010, university qualification swept the highest standard level of engagement in education opposite to primary school qualification which appointed the least.
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
- Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on their planets is important Others however think that it s a waste of public money because there are much more important issues requiring funding on our own planet Discuss both views and giv 61
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore Write at least 150 words 78
- The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962 84
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 61
flaws:
No. of Words: 125 200
Minimum 150 words wanted
========================
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 125 200
No. of Characters: 699 1000
No. of Different Words: 76 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.344 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.592 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.083 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 51 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.775 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.563 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.563 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.234 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4