the graph shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks betweem 1978 and 2009
The line graph illustrates the variation of prices for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks from 1978 to 2009.
Overall, prices increased for the three food production groups. The price of fresh fruits and vegetables was the only one whichs was higher than the Consume Price Index.
Iin 1979, prices for these groups were virtually the same, at about 70, as same as the Consumer-price Index. By 2987, the trends of these items had been similar, which rose slightly to over 100. In 1995, the price of fruits and vegetables was about 200, higher than the CPI. Whereas, the figures for sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks were lower, at about 140 and 130 respectively.
During the remainder of the period, fresh fruits and vegetables saw a considerable increase in price, to around 330 in the year 2009. There was a significant rise to under 200 in the price of sugars and sweets in 2009. The figure for carbonated drinks was the lowest, at over 150.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...was the only one whichs was higher than the Consume Price Index. Iin 1979, prices for thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81176470588 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49411764706 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2328038913 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384487948158 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162193874807 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153706475035 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296406648407 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181769300543 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.