the graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy for four countries from 1975 to 2000.
The line graph demonstrates the expenditure on research into renewable energy source of certain countries, including Switzerland, Denmark, Spain and Uk, from 1975 to 2000. A glance at the figure reveals that all these governments concerned on discovery of renewable power, however, the money they spend were in considerably different tendency.
As can be seen from the chart, the fee that switzerland paid for research was in considerable upward trend during the last quarter of 20th century where that of two other countries wildly fluctuated. Particularly, starting with $0 per person in 1975, amount of money each citizen of Switzerland donated significantly rose and then, finally, touched the peak at $5 in 2000. In the similar way, the spending of Denmark also was also continuously increased, exception of stability of roughly $1 from 1980 to 1985, which makes Denmark became the second highest countries.
Turing into spain and uk, the spending of these 2 countries rose and fell erratically during time span of 25 years, however, in opposite phase. In each interval of years between 1985 and 2000, when the spend of uk climbed, the spend of spain slid, and consequently, in 2000, there were only just beneath $1 of spending of each, in which of spain was slightly higher.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and then, finally, touched the peak at in 2000. In the similar way, the spendin...
^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased, exception of stability of roughly from 1980 to 1985, which makes Denmark b...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...al of years between 1985 and 2000, when the spend of uk climbed, the spend of spain slid,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...and 2000, when the spend of uk climbed, the spend of spain slid, and consequently, in 200...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, in 2000, there were only just beneath of spending of each, in which of spain w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, however, if, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15458937198 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80287340519 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632850241546 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.0863507692 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 152.428571429 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313753573222 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129531590948 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930089515013 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203739244264 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656619021438 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.