The two-line graphs demonstrate a comparison between foreign and local students who enrolled in the university in Australia the year between 2001 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graphs is that in both cases the number of total scholar grew over time but after a certain time the number of local students remained level of. On the other hand, in the case of commencing, the two lines are different from each other.
To begin with the total figure, in 2001, the number of overseas pupils was 20, 000, while the number was doubled in the case of local students. Then over the years, the number of foreign pupils rose linearly till the end. In 2004, 2007, 2010 the number was twice, thrice and four times than the beginning value respectively. Turning to the local scholar, according to the graph the number rose gradually up to 2007 and at that time the value was 60, 0000. Then it remained the same value the rest of the time.
For overseas pupils, the value upgraded slowly and in 2006 the value crossed the 20000 borderline and after 3 years the value rose twice than the previous numerical number and in the next year, the value slightly increased. After that, the local pupil, the peak value was 220000 in 2002 then it drifted off and after 2006 the value fluctuates till the end.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64935064935 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17975577642 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7955018804 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119164823016 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516021584088 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598895086838 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094563091974 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065053961321 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.