The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000-2007 and 2008-2012.
The bar charts compare the rise of salaries in G7 countries within two periods(2000-2007 and 2008-2012).
Overall, it can be seen from the graph that in the UK, US and Italy the wages grew in the first period, whereas over the last period there was a decline. However, France and Germany had converse trends over these two periods. Canada faced stable rates in both years.
Numerically speaking, United Kingdom's citizens had the highest soar at just over 5 per cent. From 2000 to 2007 only in 2005 the wages remained at the same level, nevertheless in other years there was an increase, ranging from 1% to 5%. In the United states the figures were very similar to the UK's figures, and then following by a plummet in the salaries of British people from 2008 to 2012 at nearly 2%. But in Unites states the figures had a steady trend. The data of Japan oscillated throughout the given period, having a maximum growth and fall at 2 percent.
The last two years were crucial for Italians, who faced a dip at roughly 2 percent. According to other European countries, Germany and France had a constant rise of wages with some periods when the data remained unchanged. Canada was the country, where was the most growths in salaries each year up to four percent, even though in 2002 there was a slight tumble at minus 1%.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects sho 73
- In many parts of the world there is continuous coverage of sport on television. Some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 89
- We all work or will work with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a coworker(someone you work closely with)? Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are important. 78
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, nevertheless, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62393162393 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42372125472 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4062701405 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1666666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145881329147 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486428173193 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664499499756 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105794251117 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810758856001 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.