Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There have been arguments over the choice of better job, whether it should be with greater salary or with pleasing working environment. In my point of view, it is the matter of the definition of happiness, which can be various amongst different individuals.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some consider that money can ensure with anything, including happiness. Preferences and dreams of these people may be purchasing luxurious items, vacations in abroad, fancy cars or up-to-date gadgets, and these possessions may make them feel glorious. Moreover, if the one decides to own a better vehicle or accommodation, he/she not only satisfies the inner eager, but raises the financial status in the society as well by converting him or her well respected amongst other people around. Therefore, with this type of mindset the acknowledgement of well-paid jobs are more beneficial is touted by common folk.
On the other hand, materialism should not be accounted as the main goal of the lifetime. The sense of internal liberation might not always be fulfilled in the job with higher income, as not everything can be bought for money. To compound, people who exclusively work for income exhaust their energy for unwanted campaign and soon lose their motivation, thereby getting stressed and pervading it to the relationships with closest ones. Those, who obtain pleasure from the working process primarily, and only after that profit, are seemingly the happiest part of the population. Thus, job satisfaction should be overlooked before choosing the atmosphere, where enormous part of the life is spent.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that everyone should take into consideration the first and foremost aspect of any job satisfaction, and only after it should be accompanied by a gratifying salary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the closest'.
Suggestion: with the closest
...d and pervading it to the relationships with closest ones. Those, who obtain pleasure from t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25172413793 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90036899534 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8144413591 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117500993399 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415029775341 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261468570852 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665275111848 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03065633466 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.