Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
Some people are convinced that financial reserve of the government, primarily, should be allocated to the public needs than on arts. Opposers, including me, firmly believe that it is not a squander and arts play a major role in developing society.
To begin with, arts are one of the main sources of revenue in the leading countries such as United States and United Kingdom. Prominent performers and their uniqueness attract tourists all over the globe to visit their homeland, and thereby governments after receiving taxes, have a chance to contribute them to the development of local infrastructure. Furthermore, the investments on arts would enable common folk to choose the eligible career path.To compound, millions of gifted people squander their life on the unwanted activity, leading depressive lifestyle, and so become drug addicted or consume excessive amount of alcohol. Therefore, art seems to have more beneficial ways, in a view of avoiding devastating outcomes and to make contributions to the countries' budget.
On the other hand, there are several reasons for subsidising an amount of budget on public services. First and foremost, public services such as schools, hospitals and others determine the living standard in all countries. The environment would collapse and the health of the population would tumble, unless the governments feel reluctantly and stop spending the particular amount of budget on these sectors. Moreover, the rate of illiteracy would even grow in case if the quality of teaching would not be taken into consideration. Thus, there should be relevant life conditions in order to evolve the current society.
From the given points, the role of arts in the cultural identity of a country should not be underestimated, however, the governments should devote resources on the basic services as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...uding me, firmly believe that it is not a squander and arts play a major role in developin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...folk to choose the eligible career path.To compound, millions of gifted people squ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34137931034 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91676241279 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610344827586 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3723658366 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.083333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114710204865 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362147166776 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313984715432 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641265846073 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013658994763 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.