The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table chart compares the percentage of people who subsidised money in three categories in five European countries over the year 2002.
Overall, it is evident that for things such as food, drink or tobacco citizens of all countries spent the most of their money, whereas for recreational activities and education the lowest amount.
In terms of details, the highest amount of money on food/drinks/tobacco spent Turkish people, at almost a third. Also, in Ireland the figures made up about 29%, however, other countries including Spain, Italy and Sweden was spent 19, 16 and just over 15 per cent, respectively. Italians were the most costly on clothing and footwer, accounting for 9%, but in Ireland, Spain and Turkey citizens subsidising slightly over 6 per cent on the clothes and footwear, while Swedwn's figures made only around 5%.
According to the countries' spendings on recreational activities and education, Ireland and Spain had the lowest proportion at about 2 percent. Italy and Sweden had the very same percentage at 3,20%, and Turkey were the highest paid country consisting of almost 4,5 percent in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- The tradition that family get together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 61
- The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010. 89
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
- The graph below shows the reason for the use of social media by businesses by size of business in 2012 82
- We all work or will work with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a coworker(someone you work closely with)? Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are important. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, third, whereas, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18131868132 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81771720546 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7947664627 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098258416187 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515291574117 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511520265434 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737576406998 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563142905582 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.