The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.]

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.]

The line graph illustrates, the account for both genders working six various employment division during the year of 1975 and 1995 in Republic of Freedonia. Units are measured in number of employees in (1000).

Overall, overwhelming majority of people in both genders working in non defense public sector in both given years. While, the most significant changes occurred in finance or banking section.

In terms of communication, male workers are remained same with 300, whereas, the number of females was increased from 1975 to 1995 which is around 300 and near 600 respectively. Likewise, regarding wholesale and retail trade male employees was 700, whilst, the account of female workers climbed up to 800 in 1995 which was approximately 700 in 1975. Moreover, manufacturing workers remained constant in both years with 300 females and 700 males.

On the other hand, the least number of workers occupied in defense public sector in over the given period. The account of females was increased as compared to male during the 20 years period such as, female workers number rose from below 100 to near 200. Futhermore, in non defence public sector has same proportion of females and males with near 700 and over 800 respectively in both years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...occurred in finance or banking section. In terms of communication, male workers ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...female workers climbed up to 800 in 1995 which was approximately 700 in 1975. Mor...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, regarding, whereas, while, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65434726444 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8398042164 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343291375105 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121946931866 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736211130377 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182710838455 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897005517374 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.