The graphs below show the value of Australian trading with China, Japan and the United States. (Value is estimated in term of australian dollars - billions)
The line graphs compare Australian trade with three countries from 2004 to 2009, calculated in Australian dollars.
Overall, it is clear that the value of trade with the USA remained relatively constant, while the value of exports and imports to and from Japan and China fluctuated significantly over the period.
In 2004, imports from the USA were valued at 10 billion Australian dollars, rising slightly to 11 billion dollars by 2009. The value of exports was considerably higher, at around 30 billion dollars throughout the period.
In contrast, imports from Japan had a higher value than exports to that country. From a value of about 19 billion dollars in 2004, there was then an increase to reach a peak of 40 billion dollars in 2008, before falling to 31 billion dollars at the end of the period. Exports to Japan fluctuated slightly between 10 billion dollars in 2004 and 14 billion dollars in 2009.
The value of imports from China increased from 11 billion to 40 billion dollars over the period, overtaking the value of exports to that country. However, the export trade also saw an increase, rising to 31 billion dollars in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-22 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The three charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94329896907 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52333671669 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443298969072 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6988664826 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36077076412 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181687337841 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483648011677 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235946122972 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00539056382298 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.