The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040.
The given chart illustrates the changes in the propotion of the urban and rural population and by severals age groups from 1950 to 2040.
It is clear that urban area is by far the most popular living place, and 15 to 65 years old group is take the highest precentage among the year. In constrast, the lowest figure belonged to rural place in all the years.
Obviously, the rural population was about 4% in 1950; this ratio has increased slightly to 5% in 2000. This proportion peaked in 2004, and is expected to be around 8% in 2040. The fraction of the people living in cities, which was more than 6% in 1095, then increased to 18% in 2000, painted a different image. The same might be said for the percentage of the whole population. This likewise has a high start at around 11%, then doubles to over 30% in 2000, and peaks at around 42% in 2040.
Regarding to the graph, the percentage of 15-65 people stood at 6% in 1950, then rose to 20% in 2000 and to 35% in 2040. In constrast, the percentage of under age 15 group and over 65 have a same start at about 2.5% in 1950. 1960 predicted the peak at 5% of under 15 years old groups; opposite to this was the fall to the bottom at 2,5% in the same years. An opposite picture could be seen in the year 1970, when this two group both change to 4%. Then, they both slightly change to about 5% in the 2040. This percentage hit the peak in 2004, about 8% in 2040. An opposite picture could be seen in the percentage of population in urban, when it was more than 6% in 1095, then have a leap to 18% in 2000.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement English grammar is one of the easiest language systems to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion Do not use memorized examples 90
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 11
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 33.7804878049 216% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 300.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.18666666667 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2358195117 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8299998198 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7333333333 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.93333333333 5.23603664747 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260317539679 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974416848898 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116680813985 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213002166226 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170637860379 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.02 11.4140731707 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.37 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.