The bar chart illustrates the activities carried out by both UK graduates and postgraduate students who did not engage in full-time work after completing college in the year 2008. Generally, most graduates and postgraduates furthered their studies, while an insignificant number of both groups offered themselves for voluntary work. Many graduates and postgraduates engaged in part-time work. However, the number of postgraduates that were unemployed were significantly lower in relation to those that engaged in part-time work, a sharp contrast when compared to UK graduates.
29,665 graduates engaged in further studies after finishing school, making it the highest step taken by graduates. The opposite was the case for graduate that volunteered themselves for work as they were the very least, numbering 3,500. There was no much difference between graduates that decided to carry out part-time jobs and those that were actually unemployed, having 17,735 and 16,235 in numbers respectively.
Similar to graduate, most postgraduates furthered their studies, numbering 2,725. Voluntary work was less appealing to them as less than 500 of them chose that option. A lot of postgraduates took up part-time work with a boastful figure of 2,535, while those that remained unemployed where 1,625.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... very least, numbering 3,500. There was no much difference between graduates that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64285714286 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0082317994 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1497330952 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20591232871 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917940493284 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918209486453 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135636510227 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870990939226 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.