The bar graph depicts number of people going to jail from five countries between 1930 to 1980.
Overall, it can be observed that United States had the highest number of people going to jail in the period of 1940, 1960 to 1980. Also, in 1930 and 1950, Canada consisted of higher number of imprisonments. Great Britain had the lowest number of people imprisoned from 1930 to 1970 while in 1980 Australia comprised of the least imprisonments.
In the period from 1930 to 1950, Canada showed fluctuations in the people going behind bars which was above 100 thousand. In 1930, United States had the many people going to jail too, it also showed fluctuations in the number of people in the 30 years period, it had the highest number of imprisonments in 1940 which included around 122 thousand people and it reduced slightly in the next 10 years respectively. The number of people in jail from Australia and New Zealand went on reducing over the thirty years period which consisted of approximately 40000 people. The people from Great Britain going behind bars slightly rose from 1930 to 1950 which showed 40 thousand people respectively.
An analysis of 1960 to 1980, discloses Great Britain and New Zealand had increasing number of individuals going in prison that comprised around 60 thousand people. Canada, united states showed slight fluctuations accounting the prisoners. The numbers increased in 1960 and suddenly reduced and again increased. Australia had more numbers and then suddenly it reduced.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07258064516 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64544402502 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431451612903 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8286906277 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0761886420786 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397225264993 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400704681316 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072970057234 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476075598132 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.