The line chart below shows the acid level in mouth from consuming sugars/ honey.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The poly line graph illustrates the information about the level of acid after eating sugars and honey in mouth during eaten moments. However, units are measured in PHI level.
In overall, there are lots of transformation can be notice in acid level which comes from consuming sugars and honey over the periods.
With regards to graph, the honey are most popular for spreading acid level among mouth which accounted at 5 PHI level in 5 minutes. After this, it starts increase dramatically and reached to peak level at 7 PHI level during 25 minutes. Likewise, the acid level of honey after consuming remain constant in remaining minutes.
The graph further proves that cane sugar attained a lowest figure for leaving acid level which can be observed at less than 5 PHI level between 5 minutes period. Similarly, it shows ups and down trend and showing a drastic rise from 40 minutes. Furthermore, fruit sugar which accounted for above 4 PHI level in the beginning of the minutes. Beside that, the acid level of fruit sugar remained stable between 15 minutes as well as 25 minutes. Lastly, it continuously growing at 7 PHI level at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 51, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...further proves that cane sugar attained a lowest figure for leaving acid level wh...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, lastly, likewise, similarly, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86432160804 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49504445596 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532663316583 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3654238526 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246998249625 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112900807343 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603685742078 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184048667943 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310933959177 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.