The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The line graph given illustrates the information about the amount of three categories fast food, namely pizza, fish and chips, which the youth Australian consumed over the course 25 years, from 1975 to 2000.
In general, the figure for Fish and Chips was a downward trend while there was rapid growth in the expenditure on both pizza and hamburgers.
In 1975, fish and chips stood at the highest in the consumption, approximately 100, while the popularity of hamburgers and pizza were lower, around 10 times and about 5 times respectively.
Over the 25 years, the hamburgers rose significantly by 1985, about 85 times before reaching a peak in 2000, <span style="font-size: 13pt; line-height: 18.5467px;">approximately 100 </span><span style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 17.6px;">times. This was the same for pizza, this number saw a considerable boom before remaining stable, just over 82 times. On the contrary, there was a sharp fluctuation in the pizza between 1975 and 1985, then it declined substantially to the lowest in 2000, just under 40 times.</span>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55089820359 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.11929046198 2.65546596893 155% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640718562874 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8876992488 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109689837202 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594154394301 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860239015718 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803564448704 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978171834147 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.