The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The line graph depicts figures and kinds of junk food consumption by Australian adolescents over the period from 1975 and 2000. Overall, it can be clearly seen that there was an upward trend of consuming pizza and hamburgers between 1975 and 2000, while the number of fish and chips consumed yearly experienced a decrease.
According to the graph, it is clear that consumption of fish and chips were quite popular among Australian teenagers, and it was eaten 100 times per year in 1975s. Over the period from 1975 to 1980, popularity of fish and chips decreased slightly from 100 to around 82 times per year. After that, in the following 5 years, fish and chips experienced an increase. Then, the situation changed completely, the trend for fish and chips reached a low of approximately 40 times per year in 2000.
On the other hand, in 1975, pizza and hamburgers were not so popular as fish and chips, and were eaten nearly 10 times per year. However, between 1975 and 1985, hamburgers popularity climbed sharply from 10 to just over 83 times per year. Then, the ratio of hamburgers fluctuated slightly between 1985 to 2000. Moreover, in the following 20 years, demand for pizza increased gradually from 10 to 83 times per year. After that, the number of pizzas eaten per year remained unchanged from 1995 to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-30 | baoquyen1906 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | beobuic1 | view | |
| 2023-01-16 | beobuic1 | view | |
| 2022-08-07 | Taiwo Morounfolu | view | |
| 2022-08-07 | Taiwo Morounfolu | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The advantages of English spreading as a global language will continue outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The best way to improve health is to do exercise To what extent do you agree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82378854626 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50976087481 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493392070485 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8147399201 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5454545455 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179083518081 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839318670442 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771340074355 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155097294681 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890626147661 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.