The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts, the household rates occurs in three countries such as UK, France and Germany between 2005 - 2015. In a bird's view, there is irregular and disproportional trends have seen on each countries.
In terms of western countries like France and Germany stated as directly proportional trends. Thereafter, least recycling rates recorded at about 20% in 2005 for Germany on beginning. Then for the end, 2015 lower rate mentioned as recycling rates for France at around 40%. In case of Germany, the rate is rising up slightly and to concerned with a slope then it peaks up 58% of recycling. Subsequently, In terms of western countries, Germany recorded as highest rate approximately 57%.
Warm regards of European country like UK experienced the second largest rate from the former, but the very largest trend at latter(60%). In 2005 it is slightly increased to 2007 and it steadily witnessed at 40%, then it skyrocketing to 53% next it raised a bit upto 60% in 2008.
Having decoded the line graph, the irregular trends have seen in all countries, while UK and Germany are raised up rates witnessed. But France is recorded opposite of the trends from other western countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...directly proportional trends. Thereafter, least recycling rates recorded at about 20% i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'as the highest'.
Suggestion: as the highest
... of western countries, Germany recorded as highest rate approximately 57%. Warm regards...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01005025126 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78197322058 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.3247227802 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6363636364 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172757912217 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718826939942 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876584479105 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117491722409 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743175756884 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.