The line graph below shows how much money was spent on cars in four different countries in Asia.
The line graph compares the expenditure on cars in China, Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia between 1995 and 2005. Units are measured in millions of US dollars.
Overall, the amount of money spent on cars in four Asian countries increased dramatically. It is also noticeable that China spent the most over the period given, while Indonesia spent the least from 1995 to 2001 and was replaced by Thailand in the following years.
China's spending was by far the highest which began in 1995 at around $80 million then fluctuated in the following years before increasing to peak at just under $ 100 million in 2005. The second highest spender was Vietnam which spending started at approximately $50 million after which the figure grew steadily to hit a high of about $75 million in 2005.
The amount of money spent on cars in Thailand hovered between around $50 million to just below $ 60 million from 1995 to 2003 but grew slightly to just over $60 million in 2005, which was the smallest spending. Indonesian's spent the least in 1995 at $ 30 million then subsequently rose to hit a high of just above $70 million in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
...before increasing to peak at just under $ 100 million in 2005. The second highest sp...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 94, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$60'.
Suggestion: $60
... between around 0 million to just below $ 60 million from 1995 to 2003 but grew slig...
^^^^
Line 13, column 247, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$30'.
Suggestion: $30
... Indonesians spent the least in 1995 at $ 30 million then subsequently rose to hit a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78756476684 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55556737629 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4473735689 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165172326271 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898741141956 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836055551681 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118417451206 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694697149994 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.