The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from

The line graph gives information about overseas visitors coming to Australia yearly while the tables illustrates the visitors' nations from 1975 to 2005.
Overall, it is clearly that the number of tourists who came from other countries rose dramatically. In addition, most of abroad visitors were Japanese both in 1975 and 2005.
In 1975, the total number of overseas residents visiting Australia was 8.8 million. The figure for Japan accounted for 3.2 million- the highest number , while these amounts of tourist coming from South Korea and Europe were lower, 2,9 million and 1,1 million respectively. These figures for USA, Britain all were under 1 million. 0,3 million overseas inhabitants visiting to Australia were Chinese.
In 2005, Australia saw a dramatic increase in the total amount of abroad visitors, to 30,4 million. 12 million Japanese tourists visited to Australia in 2005, 11,2 million higher than China's figure- the lowest amount. The figure for South Korea rose to 9,1 million, about three times higher compared to 1995's amount. 1,1 millions abroad residents travelling to Australia were from USA, lower than Britain's amount( 2,9 million) and Europe's figure(4,5 million).

Votes
Average: 5.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...verall, it is clearly that the number of tourists who came from other countries r...
^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nted for 3.2 million- the highest number , while these amounts of tourist coming f...
^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2005, 11,2 million higher than Chinas figure- the lowest amount. The figure fo...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38172043011 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48713122449 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.796759667 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192807283165 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982583432236 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970196900503 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160483845022 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973281810574 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.