The line graph illustrates the money of utilization and manufacturing of oils per day in China nation between 1980 and 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that the rate of oil production in china was the highest. Also, there was a fluctuation observed in prices of production and consumption of oil in the given time period.
In details, in 1980, about 3 millions of barrels of oil was consumed per day, whereas oil making rates was 4 millions of barrels per day. From 1980 to 1993, there was an increase in oil manufactured price, which went up to 8 millions barrels. By contrast, the value of consumption oil as per day remained unchanged but with fluctuation during the years 1980 to 1993, and stood at 3 millions of barrels.
After that years, from 1993 to 2006, there was a dramatic rise in production, while slight decrease in consumption. In 2006, the oil consumed rates reached its peak and stood at 13 millions of barrels per day. Meanwhile, the production rates were fallen from 7 millions barrels to 6 millions barrels per day in 2006.
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information 73
- The two pie charts below show changes in world population by region between 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 72
- Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in australia The table shows the amount of dollars spent on various activities per week while the pie chat shows 78
- The chart shows the sports played in Australia in 2003 All figures in percentage 75
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...e period. In details, in 1980, about 3 millions of barrels of oil was consumed per day, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...d per day, whereas oil making rates was 4 millions of barrels per day. From 1980 to 1993, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...ng the years 1980 to 1993, and stood at 3 millions of barrels. After that years, from 1993...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '13 million'.
Suggestion: 13 million
...med rates reached its peak and stood at 13 millions of barrels per day. Meanwhile, the product...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71195652174 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72671769106 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0005611601 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222118098183 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115731728187 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848243050457 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181138787539 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959536991444 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.