The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England
The line graph illustrates the percentage of population, that have visited certain 4 various tourist attraction in the city Brighton, which is situated in England over the 30 years, starting from 1980.
Overall, all attractions has seen different popularity during the period. while art gallery and festival has not risen, only decreasing in the percentage of visits by tourists and remained almost the same respectively, other two trends have increased and there was some variance, especially in the year 1995, when the percentage of travelers reached the highest point of its trajectory.
With regards to festival in Brighton, the percentage does not changed significant, it remained almost the at the same level, decreasing from 30 to 28%. Meanwhile, there was a great increase over the first part of the period in attending the art gallery by a twofold, from approximately 21 to 36%, but then the percentage has seen the consistent decrease from 38 to 8%, falling almost by 30 per cents.
In contrast, while there was a steadily growth from 10 in the year 1980 to 23% in 2010 in visiting one of the attractions - Pier, the percentage of travelers in the Pavilion has been risen from 25% to nearly 48% in 1995, reaching the peak of the trend. The next part of the period saw a gentle fall from this point to 29% in the year 2010, declining by 17%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...different popularity during the period. while art gallery and festival has not risen,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed the highest point of its trajectory. With regards to festival in Brighton, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...al in Brighton, the percentage does not changed significant, it remained almost the at ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 30, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...nts. In contrast, while there was a steadily growth from 10 in the year 1980 to 23% in 2010...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89655172414 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74782035061 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564655172414 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.0015305976 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.285714286 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1428571429 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152891314455 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713691774816 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874970161269 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111643028193 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094249916144 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.