The line graph illustrates the changes in the proportion of visitors who went to four different tourist attractions in Brighton.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage visiting the Art Gallery and Festival fell over the whole period,while the proportion of visitors to other attractions increased. In 1980,only 10% of tourists went to Brighton Pier. After many minor fluctuations, this figure increased significantly from 12% to over 20%. Over the year, the percentage visiting Pavilion came to first and reached peak of nearly 50% in 1995. But it then fell sharply to just over 30% in 2010,higher than the Festival.
The most famous Brighton attraction in 1980 for visitors to England was Festival. Although almost 40% of visitor attended the festival in 1985.By 2010,this figure decreased slightly to 28% . In 1980,the figure for visitors to Art Gallery was over 21%. It rose to a peak of less than 40%. Then this figure went down dramatically to under 10%, which was the least popular attractions at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
... and Festival fell over the whole period,while the proportion of visitors to other att...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...0 for visitors to England was Festival. Although almost 40% of visitor attended the fest...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...f visitor attended the festival in 1985.By 2010,this figure decreased slightly to ...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...10,this figure decreased slightly to 28% . In 1980,the figure for visitors to Art ...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llery was over 21%. It rose to a peak of less than 40%. Then this figure went dow...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07058823529 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82531802489 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.569643736 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3636363636 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150411747621 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621695614672 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878128601652 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150113056297 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113410266347 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.