In recent decades, Climate change has been receiving a great deal of media attention due to its subtiantial impact on the human life. Some people argue that we need to accept it rather than try to stop it. I completely disagree with this opinion because this is not a good solution to combat climate change.
There are a number of reasons why the coexistence is fraught with pitfalls. First, climate change is usually sharped by human activities rather than nature itself. For instance, most nations rely on carbon-rich fuels like gas, oil in order to drive the world’s economy, which greatly contributing to global warming. Second, if inhabitants agree to keep environment ,corporations, especially in the manufacturing and mining industries, would not. Therefore, it can be implied that if corporations were not held accountable for their contribution to global warming, the issue of climate change would be more serious.
It is more economically sound to actively prevent climate change than to ignore it. In fact, the cost we need to deal with the future consequences of climate change can be overwhelming. For example, the tremendous storm can destroy many destructions and deaths which would take decades to recover. Moreover, Temperature increase can cause the extinction of many species worldwide. For example, people would spend money on establishing natural park to prevent the ecosystem instead of spending in keys field, including education and health care, which leads to an improvement in the quality of life of the whole country.
In conclusion. It is clear that governments and corporations should actively prevent the climate change rather than to live with it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...if inhabitants agree to keep environment ,corporations, especially in the manufact...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26765799257 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91437485514 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609665427509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4582203032 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.214285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234929865326 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741947120044 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653157835676 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151074073801 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421790288358 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.