The polyline graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England who went to four separate
tourist attractions in Brighton between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage visiting the Pavilion and the Pier increased over the period.
While the proportion of travellers to other attractions decreased.
In 1980, only 10% of tourist to England went to Pier. Despite some minor fluctuations, this figure
rose from around 9% in 1990 to 22% in 2010. The percentage visiting the Pavilion also increased,
from approximately 23% in 1980 to almost 50% in 1995. However, this figure then decreased
significantly, to about 35% in 2000 and then to roughly 31% in 2010, slightly higher than the
Festival.
The most popular Brighton attraction in 1980 for visitors to England was the Festival. Although 30%
of these attended the Festival in 1980, by 2010 this percentage fell slightly to 28%. In 1980, the
figure for tourists to the Art Gallery was 21%. It then grew to a peak of around 38%, before falling
noticeably to exactly 20% in 1990. It continued to drop to less than 10% in 2010.
It was, therefore, the least popular attraction at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ors to England who went to four separate tourist attractions in Brighton between ...
^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and the Pier increased over the period. While the proportion of travellers to other a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ite some minor fluctuations, this figure rose from around 9% in 1990 to 22% in 20...
^^^
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge visiting the Pavilion also increased, from approximately 23% in 1980 to almost...
^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...995. However, this figure then decreased significantly, to about 35% in 2000 and ...
^^^
Line 8, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly 31% in 2010, slightly higher than the Festival. The most popular Brighton att...
^^^
Line 10, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o England was the Festival. Although 30% of these attended the Festival in 1980, ...
^^^
Line 11, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntage fell slightly to 28%. In 1980, the figure for tourists to the Art Gallery w...
^^^
Line 12, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to a peak of around 38%, before falling noticeably to exactly 20% in 1990. It co...
^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ued to drop to less than 10% in 2010. It was, therefore, the least popular attra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98994974874 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75467651842 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4693074786 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3846153846 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3076923077 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220987558608 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765596239886 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858280966598 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797124755755 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069603340711 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.