The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph represents how many tourists visited four different attractions (art gallery, pavilion, pier and festival) in Brighton in a percentage from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, pavilion had the most of visitors over the projected periods whereas the art gallery was the least popular attractions among tourists by 2010. Festivals had a constant percentage of tourists every year, while there was increasing in preferences to visit the pier in the same periods.
In terms of pavilion and festival, pavilion had experienced a rising preference of tourists visiting the places over the period, whereas festival had the similar preferences among tourists as which percentage was constant. In details, tourists visiting the pavilion doubled the amount from 20% to over 40% in the first fifteen years and then it decreased slowly to 30% of tourist’s rates by 2010. Meanwhile, festival had 30%of visiting rates in 1980 and which rates decreased to close to 30% in 1985 but this rate remained unchanged during the same periods.
In contrast, there was a quick rise with the visiting rates to the art gallery from 20% to 35% in the first five years and then it continuously plummeted to below 10% of tourists visiting rates by 2010, while the pier had a frequent increase with the tourists visits as it grew more than 10% by 2010 from 10% visiting rates in 1980.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the visitors') or simply say ''most visitors''.
Suggestion: most of the visitors; most visitors
...980 to 2000. Overall, pavilion had the most of visitors over the projected periods whereas the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'then', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274131274131 0.268076937826 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.127413127413 0.116061578633 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0772200772201 0.0759168565197 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.019305019305 0.0366838410393 53% => OK
Pronouns: 0.011583011583 0.0131127313244 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.158301158301 0.155750635184 102% => OK
Participles: 0.042471042471 0.0379272487307 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67624680457 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.034749034749 0.0210936926555 165% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.100386100386 0.0948980150116 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.011583011583 0.00967000014798 120% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1360.0 1161.00487805 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.9 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99118942731 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73763899035 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.325991189427 0.337110787985 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299559471366 0.247514529752 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.251101321586 0.171178102325 147% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11013215859 0.112407865282 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67624680457 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480176211454 0.546246751206 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.7723778601 49.3433353143 87% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 32.4285714286 23.0094962315 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4934282259 42.9750493124 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.285714286 135.714022679 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4285714286 23.0094962315 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 62.3845185651 47.7609492067 131% => OK
Elegance: 3.0 2.94281807926 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453245602288 0.418131533498 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.255215631304 0.181151798455 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0486385596168 0.0850326197045 57% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.810505206593 0.706616315825 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.125373781807 0.157042692854 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275301530418 0.228904883108 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816612997004 0.108899403657 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.431936069372 0.367819155151 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.116277142378 0.0812612215331 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339016999467 0.316326947829 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717488987411 0.0921553760075 78% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.