The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. They are Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and Festival
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph provides information from the research into the popular of tourist attractions in brighton town over a 30-year period between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, according to the data, number of visitors to the pier and the pavilion followed upward trend. In contrast, remaining counterparts witnessed decreased over the period.
To be specific, there was nearly a quarter of travelers decided being to brighton’s pavilion in 1980. The proportion then climbed steadily to approximate 48% in 1995. however, this statistic rapidly fall from its peak to just above 30% 15 years later. Despite witnessing a fluctuation around 10% during the terms 1980-2000, the percentage of foreigners selected brighton pier as their destinations was sharply raised to double in the end of the period.
Turning to the downward trending counterparts, after experiencing a significant rise in the number of visitors, brighton art gallery dramatically lost their popularity over time, from the peak of just under 40% of foreign tourists to less than one tenth in 2010. proportion for Festival’s visitors declined over the period as well. however, the percentage remained stable around about 28%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ed steadily to approximate 48% in 1995. however, this statistic rapidly fall from its p...
^^^^^^^
Line 27, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Proportion
...ourists to less than one tenth in 2010. proportion for Festival's visitors declined o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 27, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...itors declined over the period as well. however, the percentage remained stable around ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6972972973 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99868001153 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654054054054 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.53131023 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137271887468 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464946680086 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477915716667 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864100169812 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402130554029 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.