The given line graph illustrates the differences and alternatives in the proportion of tourists who came to England to visit four different attractions of Brighton during 1980 to 2010.
Overall, Festival had the highest percentage in the first year but this proportion fall in the last while Pier which had the lowest proportion in the first, had an increase in percentage of tourist in the last year of the research. On other hand, the ratio of percentage of visitors between Art gallery and Pavilion almost equal in the beginning but in the end there was an significant distinct between them when the percentage of tourist of Art gallery went down contrary a rose one of Pavilion.
In particular, the proportion of travelers of Festival stood at 30% in 1980 before considerable decreased to about 25% in 1995 and then slight increased by approximate 3% in 2000 and finished with the second rank by the same level in 2010. Meanwhile, Pier which had 10% tourists in 1980 at fourth rank witnessed a fluctuation before climbed to 22% in 2010 and had the third rank which behind Festival.
Art gallery and Pavilion had the same situation which increased in the beginning and reached a peak at subsequence but dramatic declined in the end. In detail, Art gallery began with higher than 20% in 1980 while the percentage of Pavilion was approximate 23% then Art gallery reached a peak of 38% in 1985 and plunged to 8% in 2010 compares with Pavilion reached at plateau at 49% in 1995 and dropped dramatically to 30% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the beginning but in the end there was an significant distinct between them when ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, then, third, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79087452471 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74513655339 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48288973384 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7399417764 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.0 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5714285714 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113079628257 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689746319853 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113718211451 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109531043387 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136964461722 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.