The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The depicted line graph enumerates the proportion of visitors to England who visited four respective sites in Brighton.
Overall, among the four various attraction sites, most of the travelers had explored Pavillion throughout the years. Whereas, the least ratio of sightseers visited Pier over the given period.
To initiate, the most marked change had seen in Art Gallery, peaking from just over 20 percent in 1980 to nearly 40 percent in 1985. However, it doesn't remain stabilized in the upcoming years, declining from nearly 40 percent in 1985 to around 9 percent at the end of the given period 2010. Moreover, the majority of 22 percent of visitors seem to visit Pavillion at the beginning of the time frame 1980 which gradually rise up to 1995 at nearly half proportion. Similarly, this trend doesn't remain stable in the last twenty years, falling from nearly half ratio in 1995 to about a quarter in 2010.
On the contrary, the least number of visitors seem to have visited Pier over the years. However, the proportion of Pier had experienced certain fluctuation for over twenty years, which later gradually increased from 12 percent to about a quarter in 2010. Furthermore, around 30 percent of visitors seem to explore festivals throughout the respective years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...xplored Pavillion throughout the years. Whereas, the least ratio of sightseers visited ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... nearly 40 percent in 1985. However, it doesnt remain stabilized in the upcoming years...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 486, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... half proportion. Similarly, this trend doesnt remain stable in the last twenty years,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, similarly, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12380952381 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60374751729 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1473915441 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0739593316742 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414947535595 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755030168181 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887145653318 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10167328455 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.