It is clear that while the percentage of tourist went to Zoo and Aquarium grew up, the opposite was true for Festival and Aquarium fell over the period shown. It is also notable that Castle was the most attractive place for tourist in Scotland.
In 1980, the proportion of visitor who chose Castle and Zoo had nearly 25% and 10% visitor respectively. Over a period of 20 years, Castle attracted about 35% of the visitor in Scotland and decreased significantly after steep increasing and peak at 45% of the visitor in 1995. After 2000, the figure for Castle was a minimal fall to roughly 35% but it was still the most should-to-go place of tourist in Scotland. Meanwhile, the percentage of tourist in Zoo fluctuated around 10 to 15% during the first 20 years, then the data of Zoo grew up considerably and reached 20% in 2010.
On the other hand, Festival was the most popular tourist attraction in Scotland with 30% of Scotland visitor compared with 20% of Aquarium in 1980. Since then, the data for Festival experienced a gradual decline throughout the period and ending at about 20% at the end of the period. Although the figure of Aquarium was a rapid rise in 35% in 1985, the visitor of Scotland drop dramatically and low at nearly 10% in the last year.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 61
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, America and Russia between 2000 and 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58552682825 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5376508678 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0975663296278 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505100298654 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333308538942 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774866782933 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134669248483 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.