The line graph below shows the production of paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates the amount of wood products in the UK from 1980 to 2000
The production of paper and sawn-wood saw a continuous increase, standing at the top position over the entire period. In addition, there was a switch in the position of sawn-wood and wood-pulp, with the former's figure descend decreasing and the latter's remaining relatively unchanged
In 1980, the UK produced around 240 million tonnes of paper and packaging, compared to 200 million tonnes of wood pulp and around 175 million tonnes of sawn-wood.10 years later, the production of paper and packaging leap slightly to 250 million tonnes while the other two dropped to the same point of 150 million tonnes
In 2000, the amount of paper and packaging nudged up to a high of 350 million tonnes while sawn-wood saw a plunge drop in produce to just over 125 million tonnes. On the other hand, the production of wood pulp has recovered and exceeded the figure for sawn-wood by mostly 30 million tonnes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57811630332 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 56.0 22.4926829268 249% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 231.085842636 43.030603864 537% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 272.0 112.824112599 241% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 56.0 22.9334400587 244% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285294804487 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237024307178 0.103423049105 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795121871846 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220882581591 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878040759577 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.5 13.2329268293 223% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 31.56 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.3012195122 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.4 10.9970731707 222% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.