The line graph below shows thefts per thousand cars in four countries
between 1990 and 1999.
How many cars (in thousand) stolen in Britain, Sweden, France, and Canada between 1990 and 1990 is depicted by the graph
It was immediately apparent that Britain accounted for the majority of car thefts. Moreover, in all, but Sweden, the car stealing declined during this time.
Looking in more detail, in 1990, accounting for 17,000 of car stealing in Britain, a much higher than other countries. While the car thefts recorded just under 10,000 in Sweden, Canada, and France. Furthermore, we can see that Canada had the lowest rate of car thieving during the period.
From 1990, Canada witnessed an upward trend to above 12,000 of cars thieving. The rate, however, remained stable over the three years. Although Britain experienced a reduction number of car thefts, falling to 16,000 cars, the figure still dominates highest. Afterward, France fluctuated between 6,000-8,000 cars theft per 1000 vehicles. Despite having a downward trend of car stealing in the first three years in Canada, the number increased considerably to about 6,000 cars in 1999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
How many cars in thousand stolen in Britain, Sweden, France, and ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, look, moreover, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51823110323 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664705882353 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7492514903 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213062581819 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847562805691 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530642183588 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141285230041 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565485760621 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.