The line graph compares the rate of burglary, car theft, and robbery in Newport city over the course of nine years.
The line graph compares the rate of burglary, car theft, and robbery in Newport city over the course of nine years.
Overall, while a number of robberies remained approximately static, burglary volume experienced a considerable decrease. Car theft number, however, encountered more fluctuations in the given period.
Looking at the illustration, in 2003 the number of incidents in terms of burglary and car theft was far higher than robbery and each constituting approximately 3400,2800, and 700 respectively. In 2004, burglary number reached its highest number making nearly 3800 and it had followed by a dramatic plunged by 2008 constituting roughly 1200.
Car theft number, on the other hand, had hovered around 2800 by 2005 before reaching to its lowest number in 2006 with slightly above 6000. Since then, it has experienced a consistent rise making 2800 in 2012. Robbery number has reached the lowest number in 2008 with 500 and raised moderately to the end of the period with 500 in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-27 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 73 | view |
- The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of British individuals donating part of their emolument to benevolent organizations in two different time span. 78
- The line graph compares the rate of burglary, car theft, and robbery in Newport city over the course of nine years. 73
- The bar chart compares the volume of rentals and sales of films over the course of a decade in a specific shop. 61
- The layout demonstrates a health center in two separate era and the changes which had happened by now. 78
- The pie charts compare the proportion of monthly household income allocated for different things in low income and high-income members of a European nation. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17901234568 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83744557546 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5835943423 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2806456074 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16577216575 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.317271986312 0.0843802449381 376% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30140924601 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.403614868051 0.0819641961636 492% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.