The line graph outlines energy consumption in the USA from 1980 to the present day, with further projections up until 2030. Use is recorded in quadrillion units and is divided in to six categories, almost all of which display a general increase over time.
The given demographics representation in the form of line graph depicts the information about use of energy in the Usa since 1980 with the prediction until 2030.
In general, petrol and oil and coal accounted as high units of fuel consumption in 1980 and will increased until 2030. In contrast, nuclear, solar/wind and waterpower were less favourable fuel consumed since 1980 ans will be less chosen until 2030.
I think, petrol and oil reckoned about 35 quadrillion units in 1980 and was true as the highest fuel use at the time and has gone up gradually to about 40 quadrillion in 2015 and will increase to more than 45 quadrillion in 2030. The same trend is true for coal resources. The coal consumption was about 16 quadrillion units in 1980 and the figured levelled up through the observed years and is projected to hit the figure 30 quadrillion in 2030. Natural gas use seemed fluctuated over observed years and it points about 20 quadrillion units in 2015. However, it is imagine to level off until 2030.
In contrast, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower kept small quantities of fuel consumption compared to other fuel sources. As it is envisaged that by 2030,only some amount of fuel will be used. Nuclear used was about 40 quadrillion units in 1980 and in 2030 the figure will bite only about 7 quadrillion units. While solar/wind and hydropower also amassed about 4 quadrillion until in 1980 and in 2030 the consumption will be only about 5 quadrillion for solar and hydropower will remain the same as in year 1980.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntil 2030. In general, petrol and oil and coal accounted as high units of fuel...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ts of fuel consumption in 1980 and will increased until 2030. In contrast, nuclear, solar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'imagined'.
Suggestion: imagined
...adrillion units in 2015. However, it is imagine to level off until 2030. In contrast...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while, i think, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83650190114 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76417748742 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471482889734 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5007507457 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26941579181 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114264612365 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736713850023 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188890281996 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448940348456 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.