The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the proportion of New Zealanders between 1950 and 2050.
Overall, while the number of people from 25-37 witnessed a downward trend, that of 0-14 increased and that of 38-45 and over 65 fluctuated.
In 1950, the proportion of old people accounted for the highest with 60%. By contrast, the figure for people 38-45 , 25-37, 0-14 to under 30%. Specifically, the figure for people 38-45 made up 25%, that of 25-37 represented 20%. The proportion of children under 14 years old was the lowest at 15%.
The figure for people over 65 reach a peak at 70% in 1990, then the number is predicted to see a fall of under 60% in 2050. In comparison with number of old people, which witnessed a downward trend, the number of children under 14 years old remained relatively stable in 1990 then the number is predicted to see an upward trend to 20% in 2050. While the number of citizens in New Zealand from 38 to 45 witnessed an upward trend to approximately 50% in 1990, that of 25-37 decreased to under 20% at this time. It is predicted that the proportion of people 38-45 remained steady in 2050. In 2050 just above 0% of New Zealand people will be age of 25 - 37

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates the proportion of New Zealanders between 1950 and 2050. ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...New Zealanders between 1950 and 2050. Overall, while the number of people from...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that of 38-45 and over 65 fluctuated. In 1950, the proportion of old people ac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...By contrast, the figure for people 38-45 , 25-37, 0-14 to under 30%. Specifically,...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er 14 years old was the lowest at 15%. The figure for people over 65 reach a pe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... to see a fall of under 60% in 2050. In comparison with number of old people, which witnes...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52112676056 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52697293456 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464788732394 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8715567996 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0976161235319 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565845927032 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713662866755 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097970195911 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966871985102 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.43 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.