The line graph shows the percentage of the uses of five modern technological devices (CD, DVD, Computers, mobile Phones and internet) from 1997 to 2001 in the UK.
The line chart represents the percentage of the use of computers, mobile phones, CDs, the internet and DVDs in the UK for a period between 1997 and 2001.
In 1997, 60% of DVDs used in the UK, and this figure fell before rising steeply to reach a peak of approximately 80% in 1998. From then on, however, it decreased significantly to a level of about 10% in 2001.
The percentage of CD users were 50% in the UK in 1997 which mean that the growth in this category was constant over the period. However, mobile phones were used in 1997, in the UK with the beginning at 40%, and this figure climbed swiftly progressing in the next 5 years and traversed to 80% by 2001. On the other hand, using computer accounted for 20% in 1997, although this category also incremented dramatically, rising from about 20% to around 90% during the period. In contrast, the proportion of the usage of the internet was 10% in 1997. In comparison with it gradually increased and reached 40% in 2001.
Overall, Most of the users choice computer rather than other technological gadgets. This category experienced a sharp growth from 1997 to 2001, whereas there was a continuing upward trend in the using of other devices expect CDs and DVDs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for a period between 1997 and 2001. In 1997, 60% of DVDs used in the UK, and...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly to a level of about 10% in 2001. In 1997, the percentage of CD users were...
^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...age of the internet was 10% in 1997. In comparison with it gradually increased and reached...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y increased and reached 40% in 2001. Overall, Most of the users choice comput...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68981481481 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61284664544 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2103302715 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323304222088 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12325217122 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827414547413 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207782482703 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827578179389 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.