Here, the graph demonstrates the information about car robbers which held in four varied types of nations, over the period of 10 years, units are measured in vehicles.
Overall, at a fleeting glance, It is manifest that the most striking country is great Britain which dominance the market,, however, Canada is made least amount of robbery cases and rest of the countries fluctuation.
At a first glance, the graph reveals that the trend of cars in Great Britain were presented in the peak at around 20 vehicles, similar figure can be observed in the year 1996, after a slight spurt in 1992. During the end of the stipulated period the proportion were well below 20 vehicles. It is also interesting to note that although the amount of car steals in Sweden nation were just below 10 vehicles in 1990 then by passing the years the robbery has been significantly increased to almost 15 vehicles in end of the given year.
Further analysis of the graph portrays that initially, the information related to car theft ratio in the France were nearly 5 vehicles then during the period from 1991 to 1999, the trend depicts the slightly increased with many Zig-Zag trend. It can be clearly seen that the In the Canada, the ratio of vehicles starting from appropriate 7 vehicles and settling to almost 5 vehicles in the year 1999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...great Britain which dominance the market,, however, Canada is made least amount of...
^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'made the least'.
Suggestion: made the least
...minance the market,, however, Canada is made least amount of robbery cases and rest of the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...amount of robbery cases and rest of the countries fluctuation. At a first glance, the gr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...of the stipulated period the proportion were well below 20 vehicles. It is also inte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77729257642 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52395702622 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3243417034 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.285714286 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131663270314 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598567226789 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380425191071 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779537513721 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384595116327 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.