Long-term international migration, emigration, and net migration from 1999 to 2008.
The given chart details the number of people(in thousands) who moved in and out of the UK along with the net migration numbers over a period of 9 years from 1999 to 2008.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the net survey has witnessed an erratic pattern. Also, more immigrants compared to emigrants were reported throughout the year.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, just below 500,000 people moved in the UK as against 200,000 fewer emigrants. Further, followed by a similar pattern, both the numbers rose up significantly by nearly 10,000 and 180,000 respectively in 2002 before leveling off until the next year. After that, despite a few fluctuations, immigrants jumped to a peak of approximately 580,000, while the emigrants remained lower by 200,000.
Turning to the net statistics, the number of immigrants continued to be the same at 190,000 for the consecutive two years in a row. Although the same went up marginally in 2001, the pattern observed a drop-down prior to stabilizing at 170,000 in the following two years. Further, 2004 marked the year of maximum immigrations( above 200,000). However, after reaching on par with the number in 2006, it soars up slightly before slipping down to the initial value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06511627907 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84153692065 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637209302326 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4826936586 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110993466262 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441538625421 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694472245796 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919101321488 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898687794833 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.