The map bellow is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The map bellow is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The following map illustrates the Garsdon town with 65000 population, and the two potential locations that one of them will be selected as the site to construct a new supermarket.
As can be clearly observed from the map, there are two distinct places which are labeled as S1 and S2. S1 is located in north west countryside of the town. Main roads and railway pass around S1 and its distance to Hindon (with 10000 population) is 12 km. However, far more individuals of Cransdon and Bransdon in south will experience further trips to reach S1.
Turning to the second possible site, unlike S1, S2 is placed rather the center of the town at no traffic zone. Housing part of the town surrounds S2 as well as two industry sections in the north and south. Then, people who are living in there will conveniently access S2 rather than S1. While railway and main roads are near S2, its distance from Cransdon with 29000 population is 25 km. Meanwhile, 15000 individuals who dwell in Bransdon will need to make a 16 km journey to reach S2.
Overall, it is clear from the map that whereas S2 is nearer to far more people than s2, it is likely that S2 will benefit from low-price lands of countryside as well as plenty of possible spaces for car park.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s plenty of possible spaces for car park
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, then, well, whereas, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45089285714 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46256652635 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 224.0 22.4926829268 996% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 997.0 112.824112599 884% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 224.0 22.9334400587 977% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 59.0 5.23603664747 1127% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168254451315 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168254451315 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121491511836 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706293102932 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 111.5 13.2329268293 843% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -130.5 61.2550243902 -213% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 87.1 10.3012195122 846% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.01 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.57 8.06136585366 218% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 91.6 10.9970731707 833% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 92.0 11.0658536585 831% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.