The map below show the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present.
The map give information about the development of the hometown in Ryemouth in 1995 and present.
It is clear that, the forest parks witness radical change with the most noticeable being the car park and fish market in the sea.
The village was designed in present and included housing, golf, tennis, hotel, car park, restaurant, apartment, cafe. The reception directly access apartment and next to is the cafe. Look at the map in 1995, the village have the forest park replaced by tennis located convenient way for people, the farmland at the top of forest park.
While the sea remain in the bottom, it becomes noticeable narrower and go to the next sea we will see fishing port and apartment in the present replaced by fish market. Meanwhile, compared in the present, today village has few housing( 12 houses), shop, hotel, forest park, cafe, fish market, fishing port. Besides, the hotel in the present next to car park but in 1995, that placed ceased to exist and the hotel behind is forest park. However, in 1995 this village have many area, the shop in the present is restaurant. Finally, the village in 1995 have two houses have been removed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 469, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'many areas'.
Suggestion: many areas
...ark. However, in 1995 this village have many area, the shop in the present is restaurant....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77889447236 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32253239229 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.932874915 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227324213246 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110593336272 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10703129026 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172223125327 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139187435628 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.